Editorial Statement and Corrective Publication Following Comprehensive Review

Scam-Or Project – Editorial Desk

Following an extended editorial and factual review, Scam-Or Project issues this statement in order to correct the public record in relation to previously published materials concerning Mr. Stoyan Staykov and related parties.

Scope and Methodology of the Review

The review included a full reassessment of source materials, analysis of authentic documentation provided by the affected party, and outreach to relevant third parties and institutions where appropriate.

Key Findings

• Certain sources relied upon demonstrate limited verifiability
• There are material inconsistencies between claims and verifiable facts
• A significant portion of the information cannot be independently substantiated
• Patterns of coordinated submission and dissemination of information have been identified

During the review, recurring structural and behavioral patterns were observed, allowing for a reasonable conclusion that parts of the information flow may have been the result of a systematic and coordinated approach to narrative construction.

Editorial Assessment

There are substantial grounds to conclude that parts of the initially provided information:

• were selectively structured and contextually distorted
• contained unverified implications
• may have been intended to shape a misleading public narrative

The possibility cannot be excluded that this information formed part of a targeted defamatory campaign, involving coordinated actions and the use of media channels as a vector.

On Source Patterns and Underlying Interests

Further analysis identified recurring patterns in source behavior, communication channels, and narrative framing, which indicate that certain inputs may have originated from specific, though not formally disclosed, actors or interest groups with a discernible motive to influence public perception.

Institutional Context

It has been taken into account that the affected individual has shared information with competent law enforcement authorities, which reinforces the need for heightened editorial precision and responsibility.

Actions Taken

• Removal or deactivation of the relevant publications
• Measures to limit search engine indexing and further dissemination
• Implementation of enhanced internal source verification procedures

On Manipulative Information Practices

The current media environment increasingly faces attempts to introduce manipulated or false information aimed at:

• influencing public opinion
• constructing artificial narratives
• advancing undisclosed interests

Such practices have reached a systemic scale, requiring a firm and principled response.

Editorial Standards and Responsibility

As an investigative platform, Scam-Or Project is committed to:

• verifying every source
• examining every detail in full context
• assessing not only the information, but also the motivation behind it

These standards represent a critical safeguard for the public interest, particularly in an environment affected by coordinated disinformation efforts.

This case reaffirms that:

objectivity is not a formal principle, but an operational obligation requiring constant scrutiny, independence, and accountability.

Conclusion

With this publication, Scam-Or Project:

• corrects previously disseminated information that does not meet required standards
• distances itself from unverified or misleading claims
• reaffirms its commitment to objective and responsible journalism

The editorial team will continue to actively prevent the use of media platforms for the dissemination of false, manipulative, or maliciously structured information, regardless of its source.